Impact of Pain and Adverse Health Outcomes on Long-term U.S. Testicular Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE: No study has quantified the impact of pain and other adverse health outcomes (AHOs) on global physical/mental health in long-term U.S. testicular cancer survivors (TCS) or evaluated patient-reported functional impairment due to pain. METHODS: TCS given cisplatin-based chemotherapy completed validated surveys, including PROMIS-v1.2 Global-Physical-and-Mental-Health, PROMIS pain questionnaires, and others. Multivariable linear regression examined relationships between 25 AHOs with Global-Physical (GPH) and Mental-Health (GMH) scores, and Pain-Interference Scores. AHOs with ß > 2 are clinically important and reported below. RESULTS: Among 358 TCS [median age: 46 (IQR: 38-53); median time-since-chemotherapy: 10.7 years; IQR = 7.2-16.0)], median AHO number was 5 (IQR = 3-7). 12% TCS had ≥10 AHOs, and 19% reported chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain. Increasing AHO numbers were associated with decreases in physical and mental health (P < 0.0001 each). In multivariable analyses, chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain (ß = -3.72; P = 0.001), diabetes (ß = -4.41; P = 0.037), obesity (ß = -2.01; P = 0.036) and fatigue (ß = -8.58; P < 0.0001) were associated with worse GMH, while being married/living-as-married benefitted GMH (ß = 3.63; P = 0.0006). Risk factors for pain-related functional-impairment included lower extremity location (ß = 2.15; P = 0.04) and concomitant peripheral artery disease (ß = 4.68; P < 0.001). GPH-score reductions were associated with diabetes (ß = -3.81; P = 0.012), balance/equilibrium problems (ß = -3.82; P = 0.003), cognitive-dysfunction (ß = -4.43; P < 0.0001), obesity (ß = -3.09; P < 0.0001), peripheral-neuropathy-score (ß = -2.12; P < 0.0001), and depression (ß = -3.17; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: TCS suffer AHOs that negatively impact long-term GMH, GPH, and pain-related functional-status. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Clinically important factors associated with worse physical/mental health identify TCS requiring closer monitoring, counseling, and interventions. Chemotherapy-induced neuropathic pain must be addressed, given its detrimental impact on patient-reported functional-status and mental health 10+ years after treatment.

MR-guided prostate SBRT in prostate cancer patients with low-volume metastatic disease.

BACKGROUND: Recent data have found an overall survival benefit from prostate-directed radiotherapy in patients with low-volume metastatic prostate cancer. Prostate SBRT is an attractive treatment in this setting and may be optimised with MR-guided adaptive treatment. Here, we share our institutional experience delivering stereotactic MR-guided adaptive prostate SBRT (SMART) for patients with low-volume metastatic disease. METHODS: We reviewed patients with low-volume metastatic disease who received prostate SMART from October 2019 to December 2021 on a 0.35T MR-Linac. The cohort included 14 patients. Genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities were assessed using CTCAE v 5.0. Progression was defined as a change in systemic or hormonal therapy regimen as a result of PSA rise or disease progression. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 29 months. Seven patients had hormone sensitive prostate cancer and 7 had castrate resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). 13 patients received 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions and one patient received 33 Gy in 5 fractions. At the time of last follow-up, 11 patients had not experienced progression and three patients, all with CRPC, had experienced progression. No patients developed local progression in the prostate after SMART. One patient experienced acute grade 2 urinary toxicity (7%) and no patients experienced acute grade 2 GI toxicity (0%). No grade 3 + acute toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Prostate SMART was found to be well tolerated and all patients had local control of disease within the prostate at the time of last follow-up. Prostate SMART may represent a low-risk and well-tolerated approach for delivering prostate-directed radiotherapy for patients with limited metastatic disease.

Acute toxicity comparison of magnetic resonance-guided adaptive versus fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is gaining wider adoption for prostate cancer management but there remain significant toxicity risks when delivering prostate SBRT with standard techniques. Magnetic resonance-guided daily adaptive SBRT (MRg-A-SBRT) offers technological advantages in precision of radiation dose delivery, but the toxicity profile associated with MRg-A-SBRT compared to more standardly used fiducial or computed tomography-guided non-adaptive prostate SBRT (CT-SBRT) remains unknown. METHODS: A meta-analysis to compare acute toxicity rates associated with MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT for prostate cancer was performed in compliance with PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE (PubMed) and Google Scholar were searched for prospective studies of prostate SBRT that were published between January 1, 2018 and August 31, 2022. Random effects and fixed effects models were used to estimate pooled toxicity rates, and meta-regression was performed to compare toxicity between MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT study groups. RESULTS: Twenty-nine prospective studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria and included a total of 2547 patients. The pooled estimates for acute grade 2 or higher (G2+) genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity for MRg-A-SBRT were 16% (95% confidence interval [CI], 10%-24%) and 4% (95% CI, 2%-7%) and for CT-SBRT they were 28% (95% CI, 23%-33%) and 9% (95% CI, 6%-12%), respectively. On meta-regression, the odds ratios for acute G2+ GU and GI toxicities comparing MRg-A-SBRT and CT-SBRT were 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.97, p = .04) and 0.40 (95% CI, 0.17-0.96, p = .04), respectively. CONCLUSION: MRg-A-SBRT is associated with a significantly reduced risk of acute G2+ GU or GI toxicity compared to CT-SBRT. Longer follow-up will be needed to evaluate late toxicity and disease control outcomes. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Magnetic resonance imaging-guided daily adaptive prostate stereotactic radiation (MRg-A-SBRT) is a treatment that may allow for delivery of prostate radiation more precisely than other radiotherapy techniques, but it is unknown whether this reduces side effects compared to standardly used computed tomography-guided SBRT (CT-SBRT). In this systematic review and meta-analysis combining data from 29 clinical trials including 2547 patients, it was found that the risk of short-term urinary side effects was reduced by 44% and the risk of short-term bowel side effects was reduced by 60% with MRg-A-SBRT compared to CT-SBRT.

Comparison of MR-soft tissue based versus biliary stent based alignment for image guidance in pancreatic SBRT.

PURPOSE: The role of biliary stents in image-guided localization for pancreatic cancer has been inconclusive. To date, stent accuracy has been largely evaluated against implanted fiducials on cone beam computed tomography. We aim to use magnetic resonance (MR) soft tissue as a direct reference to examine the geometric and dosimetric impacts of stent-based localization on the newly available MR linear accelerator. METHODS: Thirty pancreatic cancer patients (132 fractions) treated on our MR linear accelerator were identified to have a biliary stent. In our standard adaptive workflow, patients were set up to the target using soft tissue for image registration and structures were re-contoured on daily MR images. The original plan was then projected on treatment anatomy and dose predicted, followed by plan re-optimization and treatment delivery. These online predicted plans were soft tissue-based and served as reference plans. Retrospective image registration to the stent was performed offline to simulate stent-based localization and the magnitude of shifts was taken as the geometric accuracy of stent localization. New predicted plans were generated based on stent-alignment for dosimetric comparison. RESULTS: Shifts were within 3 mm for 90% of the cases (mean = 1.5 mm); however, larger shifts up to 7.2 mm were observed. Average PTV coverage dropped by 1.1% with a maximum drop of 26.8%. The mean increase in V35Gy was 0.15, 0.05, 0.02, and 0.02 cc for duodenum, stomach, small bowel and large bowel, respectively. Stent alignment was significantly worse for all metrics except for small bowel (p = 0.07). CONCLUSIONS: Overall discrepancy between stent- and soft tissue-alignment was modest; however, large discrepancies were observed for select cases. While PTV coverage loss may be compensated for by using a larger margin, the increase in dose to gastrointestinal organs at risk may limit the role of biliary stents in image-guided localization.

Patient-Reported Functional Impairment Due to Hearing Loss and Tinnitus After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is widely used and highly ototoxic, but patient-reported functional impairment because of cisplatin-related hearing loss (HL) and tinnitus has not been comprehensively evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) given first-line cisplatin-based chemotherapy completed validated questionnaires, including the Hearing Handicap Inventory for Adults (HHIA) and Tinnitus Primary Function Questionnaire (TPFQ), each of which quantifies toxicity-specific functional impairment. Spearman correlations evaluated associations between HL and tinnitus severity and level of functional handicap quantified with the HHIA and TPFQ, respectively. Associations between HL or tinnitus and five prespecified adverse health outcomes (cognitive dysfunction, fatigue, depression, anxiety, and overall health) were evaluated. RESULTS: HL and tinnitus affected 137 (56.4%) and 147 (60.5%) of 243 TCS, respectively. Hearing aids were used by 10% TCS (14/137). Of TCS with HL, 35.8% reported clinically significant functional impairment. Severe HHIA-assessed functional impairment was associated with cognitive dysfunction (odds ratio [OR], 10.62; P < .001), fatigue (OR, 5.48; P = .003), and worse overall health (OR, 0.19; P = .012). Significant relationships existed between HL severity and HHIA score, and tinnitus severity and TPFQ score (P < .0001 each). TCS with either greater hearing difficulty or more severe tinnitus were more likely to report cognitive dysfunction (OR, 5.52; P = .002; and OR, 2.56; P = .05), fatigue (OR, 6.18; P < .001; and OR, 4.04; P < .001), depression (OR, 3.93; P < .01; and OR, 3.83; P < .01), and lower overall health (OR, 0.39; P = .03; and OR, 0.46; P = .02, respectively). CONCLUSION: One in three TCS with HL report clinically significant functional impairment. Follow-up of cisplatin-treated survivors should include routine assessment for HL and tinnitus. Use of the HHIA and TPFQ permit risk stratification and referral to audiologists as needed, since HL adversely affects functional status and is the single largest modifiable risk factor for cognitive decline and dementia in the general population.

Comprehensive association analysis of speech recognition thresholds after cisplatin-based chemotherapy in survivors of adult-onset cancer.

PURPOSE: Deficits in speech understanding constitute one of the most severe consequences of hearing loss. Here we investigate the clinical and genetic risk factors for symmetric deterioration of speech recognition thresholds (SRT) among cancer survivors treated with cisplatin. METHODS: SRT was measured using spondaic words and calculating the mean of measurements for both ears with symmetric SRT values. For clinical associations, SRT-based hearing disability (SHD) was defined as SRT≥15 dB hearing loss and clinical variables were derived from the study dataset. Genotyped blood samples were used for GWAS with rank-based inverse normal transformed SRT values as the response variable. Age was used as a covariate in association analyses. RESULTS: SHD was inversely associated with self-reported health (p = 0.004). Current smoking (p = 0.002), years of smoking (p = 0.02), BMI (p < 0.001), and peripheral motor neuropathy (p = 0.003) were positively associated with SHD, while physical activity was inversely associated with SHD (p = 0.005). In contrast, cumulative cisplatin dose, peripheral sensory neuropathy, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia were not associated with SHD. Although no genetic variants had an association p value < 5 × 10-8 , 22 genetic variants were suggestively associated (p < 10-5 ) with SRT deterioration. Three of the top variants in 10 respective linkage disequilibrium regions were either positioned within the coding sequence or were eQTLs for genes involved in neuronal development (ATE1, ENAH, and ZFHX3). CONCLUSION: Current results improve our understanding of risk factors for SRT deterioration in cancer survivors. Higher BMI, lower physical activity, and smoking are associated with SHD. Larger samples would allow for expansion of the current findings on the genetic architecture of SRT.

Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy With Daily Online Plan Adaptation: Results of a Prospective Phase 1 Trial and Supplemental Cohort.

Purpose: Stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for prostate cancer allows for MR-based contouring, real-time MR motion management, and daily plan adaptation. The clinical and dosimetric benefits associated with prostate SMART remain largely unknown. Methods and Materials: A phase 1 trial of prostate SMART was conducted with primary endpoints of safety and feasibility. An additional cohort of patients similarly treated with prostate SMART were included in the analysis. SMART was delivered to 36.25 Gy in 5 fractions to the prostate ± seminal vesicles using the MRIdian linear accelerator system (ViewRay, Inc). Rates of urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects and patient-reported outcome measures were assessed. Dosimetric analyses were conducted to evaluate the specific benefits of daily plan adaptation. Results: The cohort included 22 patients (n = 10 phase 1, n = 12 supplemental) treated in 110 fractions. Median follow-up was 7.9 months. Acute grade 2 urinary and gastrointestinal toxic effects were observed in 22.7% and 4.5%, respectively, and 4.5% and 0%, respectively, at last follow-up. No grade 3+ events were observed. Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 urinary obstructive scores decreased during SMART (mean, 9.3 points; P = .03) and returned to baseline by 3 months. No other significant changes in patient-reported outcome measures were observed. One-hundred percent of fractions required plan adaptation owing to exceeding organ-at-risk metrics (68%) or suboptimal target coverage (33%) resulting from anatomic changes. Minimum acceptable planning target volume, rectal, bladder, and urethra/bladder neck metrics were violated in 24%, 20%, 24%, and 33% of predicted plans, respectively; 0% of reoptimized plans violated metrics. Underlying causes for deficient dosimetry before reoptimization included changes in bladder filling, seminal vesicle position, prostate volume (median 4.7% increase by fraction 3; range, 0%-56%), and hotspots shifting into urethra/bladder neck. Conclusions: Prostate SMART results in low risk of acute toxic effects with improvements in target and organ-at-risk dosimetry. The clinical benefits resulting from daily plan adaptation, including urethra/bladder neck protection, warrant further investigation.

Pharmacogenomics of cisplatin-induced neurotoxicities: Hearing loss, tinnitus, and peripheral sensory neuropathy.

PURPOSE: Cisplatin is a critical component of first-line chemotherapy for several cancers, but causes peripheral sensory neuropathy, hearing loss, and tinnitus. We aimed to identify comorbidities for cisplatin-induced neurotoxicities among large numbers of similarly treated patients without the confounding effect of cranial radiotherapy. METHODS: Utilizing linear and logistic regression analyses on 1680 well-characterized cisplatin-treated testicular cancer survivors, we analyzed associations of hearing loss, tinnitus, and peripheral neuropathy with nongenetic comorbidities. Genome-wide association studies and gene-based analyses were performed on each phenotype. RESULTS: Hearing loss, tinnitus, and peripheral neuropathy, accounting for age and cisplatin dose, were interdependent. Survivors with these neurotoxicities experienced more hypertension and poorer self-reported health. In addition, hearing loss was positively associated with BMIs at clinical evaluation and nonwork-related noise exposure (>5 h/week). Tinnitus was positively associated with tobacco use, hypercholesterolemia, and noise exposure. We observed positive associations between peripheral neuropathy and persistent vertigo, tobacco use, and excess alcohol consumption. Hearing loss and TXNRD1, which plays a key role in redox regulation, showed borderline significance (p = 4.2 × 10-6 ) in gene-based analysis. rs62283056 in WFS1 previously found to be significantly associated with hearing loss (n = 511), was marginally significant in an independent replication cohort (p = 0.06; n = 606). Gene-based analyses identified significant associations between tinnitus and WNT8A (p = 2.5 × 10-6 ), encoding a signaling protein important in germ cell tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Genetics variants in TXNRD1 and WNT8A are notable risk factors for hearing loss and tinnitus, respectively. Future studies should investigate these genes and if replicated, identify their potential impact on preventive strategies.

Ototoxicity After Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy: Factors Associated With Discrepancies Between Patient-Reported Outcomes and Audiometric Assessments.

OBJECTIVES: To provide new information on factors associated with discrepancies between patient-reported and audiometrically defined hearing loss (HL) in adult-onset cancer survivors after cisplatin-based chemotherapy (CBCT) and to comprehensively investigate risk factors associated with audiometrically defined HL. DESIGN: A total of 1410 testicular cancer survivors (TCS) ≥6 months post-CBCT underwent comprehensive audiometric assessments (0.25 to 12 kHz) and completed questionnaires. HL severity was defined using American Speech-Language-Hearing Association criteria. Multivariable multinomial regression identified factors associated with discrepancies between patient-reported and audiometrically defined HL and multivariable ordinal regression evaluated factors associated with the latter. RESULTS: Overall, 34.8% of TCS self-reported HL. Among TCS without tinnitus, those with audiometrically defined HL at only extended high frequencies (EHFs) (10 to 12 kHz) (17.8%) or at both EHFs and standard frequencies (0.25 to 8 kHz) (23.4%) were significantly more likely to self-report HL than those with no audiometrically defined HL (8.1%) [odds ratio (OR) = 2.48; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.31 to 4.68; and OR = 3.49; 95% CI, 1.89 to 6.44, respectively]. Older age (OR = 1.09; 95% CI, 1.07 to 1.11, p < 0.0001), absence of prior noise exposure (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.84, p = 0.02), mixed/conductive HL (OR = 2.01; 95% CI, 1.34 to 3.02, p = 0.0007), no hearing aid use (OR = 5.64; 95% CI, 1.84 to 17.32, p = 0.003), and lower education (OR = 2.12; 95% CI, 1.23 to 3.67, p = 0.007 for high school or less education versus postgraduate education) were associated with greater underestimation of audiometrically defined HL severity, while tinnitus was associated with greater overestimation (OR = 4.65; 95% CI, 2.64 to 8.20 for a little tinnitus, OR = 5.87; 95% CI, 2.65 to 13.04 for quite a bit tinnitus, and OR = 10.57; 95% CI, 4.91 to 22.79 for very much tinnitus p < 0.0001). Older age (OR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.15, p < 0.0001), cumulative cisplatin dose (>300 mg/m2, OR = 1.47; 95% CI, 1.21 to 1.80, p = 0.0001), and hypertension (OR = 1.80; 95% CI, 1.28 to 2.52, p = 0.0007) were associated with greater American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-defined HL severity, whereas postgraduate education (OR = 0.58; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.85, p = 0.005) was associated with less severe HL. CONCLUSIONS: Discrepancies between patient-reported and audiometrically defined HL after CBCT are due to several factors. For survivors who self-report HL but have normal audiometric findings at standard frequencies, referral to an audiologist for additional testing and inclusion of EHFs in audiometric assessments should be considered.

Second malignancy probabilities in prostate cancer patients treated with SBRT and other contemporary radiation techniques.

BACKGROUND: Prostate radiotherapy has been associated with an increased risk of developing a second malignancy (SM). However, relative SM probabilities following treatment with contemporary radiation techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or moderately hypofractionated intensity modulated radiotherapy (HF-IMRT) remain unknown. METHODS: A cohort analysis was performed of men from a nationally representative database with localized prostate cancer with at least 60 months of follow-up comparing SM probability amongst men receiving either radical prostatectomy (RP), conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (CF-IMRT), HF-IMRT, brachytherapy (BT), or SBRT, using multivariable logistic models, which were used to generate predicted probabilities. Additionally, propensity score-adjusted pairwise assessments of modalities were performed. RESULTS: For 303,432 patients included in the study, median follow-up was 9.08 years (IQR 7.01-11.21). Predicted rates of SM by treatment modality and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) for development of SM (referent: RP) were: 6.0% for RP (AOR n/a), 7.1% for CF-IMRT (AOR 1.20, 95%CI 1.14-1.25, P < 0.001), 7.3% for HF-IMRT (AOR 1.25, 95%CI 1.01-1.55, P = 0.045), 6.6% for BT (AOR 1.11, 95%CI 1.07-1.16, P < 0.001), and 5.7% for SBRT (AOR 0.95, 95%CI 0.81-1.12, P = 0.567). On propensity score-adjusted analysis, SBRT was associated with lower odds of SM compared to CF-IMRT (AOR 0.78, 95%CI 0.66-0.93, P = 0.005); no significant difference was found when SBRT was compared to RP (AOR 0.86, 95%CI 0.73-1.03, P = 0.102). CONCLUSIONS: Conventionally fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy, moderately hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and brachytherapy but not stereotactic body radiotherapy were associated with increased probability of a second malignancy compared to radical prostatectomy. Patients treated with SBRT may be at lower risk of second malignancy due to improved conformality, radiobiological differences or patient selection. The possibility that SBRT in select patients may minimize the probability of SM underscores the need for assessment of second malignancy risk in prospective studies of SBRT.

Use of Medications for Treating Anxiety or Depression among Testicular Cancer Survivors: A Multi-Institutional Study.

BACKGROUND: This study examined sociodemographic factors, cisplatin-related adverse health outcomes (AHO), and cumulative burden of morbidity (CBMPt) scores associated with medication use for anxiety and/or depression in testicular cancer survivors (TCS). METHODS: A total of 1,802 TCS who completed cisplatin-based chemotherapy ≥12 months previously completed questionnaires regarding sociodemographic features and cisplatin-related AHOs [hearing impairment, tinnitus, peripheral sensory neuropathy (PSN), and kidney disease]. A CBMPt score encompassed the number and severity of cisplatin-related AHOs. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the relationship of individual AHOs and CBMPt with medication use for anxiety and/or depression. RESULTS: A total of 151 TCS (8.4%) used medications for anxiety and/or depression. No cisplatin-related AHOs were reported by 511 (28.4%) participants, whereas 622 (34.5%), 334 (18.5%), 287 (15.9%), and 48 (2.7%), respectively, had very low, low, medium, and high CBMPt scores. In the multivariable model, higher CBMPt scores were significantly associated with medication use for anxiety and/or depression (P < 0.0001). In addition, tinnitus (P = 0.0009), PSN (P = 0.02), and having health insurance (P = 0.05) were significantly associated with greater use of these medications, whereas being employed (P = 0.0005) and vigorous physical activity (P = 0.01) were significantly associated with diminished use. CONCLUSIONS: TCS with higher CBMPt scores had a higher probability of using medications for anxiety and/or depression, and conversely, those who were employed and physically active tended to have reduced use of these medications. IMPACT: Healthcare providers should encourage TCS to increase physical activity to improve both physical and mental health. Rehabilitation programs should assess work-related skills and provide career development counseling/training.

Development and Validation of a Novel TP53 Mutation Signature That Predicts Risk of Metastasis in Primary Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Prostate tumors with TP53 gene mutations are molecularly heterogenous, and the presence of TP53 gene mutations has been linked to inferior outcomes. We developed an RNA-based gene signature that detects underlying TP53 gene mutations and identifies wild-type prostate tumors that are analogous to TP53-mutant tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using genomic expression profiles from The Cancer Genome Atlas, we developed a mutation signature score to predict prostatic tumors with a molecular fingerprint similar to tumors with TP53 mutations. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve assessed model accuracy in predicting TP53 mutations, and Cox regression models measured association between the signature and progression-free survival and metastasis-free survival (MFS). RESULTS: The TP53 signature score achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.84 in the training and 0.82 in the validation cohorts for predicting an underlying mutation. In three retrospective cohorts, a high score was prognostic for poor 5-year MFS: 46% versus 81% (hazard ratio [HR], 3.05; P < .0001; Johns Hopkins University cohort), 64% versus 83% (HR, 2.77; P < .0001; Mayo Clinic cohort), and 71% versus 97% (HR, 6.8; P = .0001; Brigham and Women's Hospital cohort). The signature also identified TP53 wild-type tumors molecularly analogous to TP53 mutant tumors, wherein high signature score correlated with worse 5-year MFS (50% vs. 82%; HR, 3.05; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: This novel mutational signature predicted tumors with TP53 mutations, identified TP53 wild-type tumors analogous to mutant tumors, and was independently associated with poor MFS. This signature can therefore be used to strengthen existing clinical risk-stratification tools.

Utilization of multimodality therapy with primary radical prostatectomy versus radiation therapy for Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: The role of multimodality therapy (MMT) in the treatment of Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer remains controversial. We sought to evaluate factors associated with MMT utilization for primary radical prostatectomy (RP) and primary radiation therapy (RT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: From the National Cancer Database, we conducted a retrospective review of 81,528 men with National Cancer Center Network Gleason 8-10 prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2015, who underwent (1) primary RP with or without early postoperative external beam RT (EBRT) or (2) primary RT (androgen deprivation therapy + EBRT) with or without brachytherapy (BT) boost. Using multivariable logistic regression models, we evaluated factors associated with the utilization of MMT, defined as early postoperative EBRT for primary RP or BT boost for primary RT. RESULTS: For primary RP, the percentages of men who underwent MMT for Gleason 8 and 9-10 disease were 12.2% and 24.1%, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, men with Gleason 9-10 were more likely to undergo MMT (odds ratio 1.03 [1.02, 1.04]), although adverse pathologic features such as T3b-4 (1.24 [1.23, 1.25]) disease demonstrated the strongest associations. For primary RT, the percentages of men who underwent BT boost for Gleason 8 and 9-10 disease were 11.8% and 9.8%, respectively. On multivariable logistic regression, men with Gleason 9-10 disease were less likely to receive BT boost (0.99 [0.98, 0.99]). CONCLUSIONS: Men with more aggressive Gleason 9 disease were more likely to undergo MMT if they underwent primary RP but not primary RT. Further blood-based or imaging biomarkers may aid in identifying optimal candidates for MMT, especially for primary RT.

Impact of percent positive biopsy cores on cancer-specific mortality for patients with high-risk prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVE: A high percent positive biopsy cores (PBC), typically dichotomized at ≥50% is prognostic of worse cancer-specific outcomes for patients with low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer (CaP). The clinical significance of ≥50% PBC for patients with high-risk disease is poorly understood. We examined the association between ≥50% PBC, compared to <50% PBC, and prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) for patients with high-risk disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 7,569 men from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program who were diagnosed with high-risk CaP (Gleason score of 8-10, prostate-specific antigen >20 ng/mL, or cT3-T4 stage) in 2010-2011 and had 6 to 24 cores sampled at biopsy. Multivariable Fine and Gray competing risks regression was utilized to examine the association between ≥50% PBC and PCSM. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.8 years. 56.2% of patients (4,253) had ≥50% PBC. On competing risks regression, ≥50% PBC was associated with a significantly higher risk of PCSM compared to <50% PBC (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 2.00, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.48-2.70, P < 0.001). On subgroup analyses, ≥50% PBC was associated with a significantly higher risk of PCSM only for cT1-T2 disease (AHR 2.23, 95% CI 1.62-3.07) but not cT3-T4 disease (AHR 0.83, 95% CI 0.39-1.76), with a significant interaction (Pinteraction = 0.016). No significant interactions by Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, use of definitive therapy, or number of biopsy cores sampled were observed. CONCLUSION: In this large cohort of patients with high-risk CaP, ≥50% PBC was independently associated with an approximately 2-fold increased risk of PCSM for patients with cT1-T2, but not cT3-T4, tumors. Percent PBC, which is a widely available clinical value, should be routinely used to risk stratify men with high-risk disease and identify patients whom may benefit from treatment intensification.

Treating the SARS-CoV-2-positive patient with cancer: A proposal for a pragmatic and transparent ethical process.

The treatment of patients with cancer who test positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) poses unique challenges. In this commentary, the authors describe the ethical rationale and implementation details for the creation of a novel, multidisciplinary treatment prioritization committee, including physicians, frontline staff, an ethicist, and an infectious disease expert. Organizational obligations to health care workers also are discussed. The treatment prioritization committee sets a threshold of acceptable harm to patients from decreased cancer control that is justified to reduce risk to staff. The creation of an ethical, consistent, and transparent decision-making process involving such frontline stakeholders is essential as departments across the country are faced with decisions regarding the treatment of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients with cancer.

Practice Patterns and Outcomes Among Patients With N0M0 Prostate Cancer and a Very High Prostate-Specific Antigen Level.

BACKGROUND: Management of patients with a very high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level (≥98.0 ng/mL) but clinically localized (N0M0) prostate cancer is challenging. This study sought to determine practice patterns and outcomes among these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 748,825 patients with prostate cancer from 2004 through 2012 were identified using the National Cancer Database. These patients were subdivided by PSA level (0-9.9, 10.0-19.9, 20.0-39.9, 40.0-59.9, 60.0-79.9, 80.0-97.9, and ≥98.0 ng/mL), nodal status (N0 vs N1), and distant metastases (M0 vs M1). Rates of locoregional treatment and 5-year overall survival (OS) in each group were determined. Survival was compared using Cox regression after adjusting for multiple patient-specific factors. RESULTS: The rate of locoregional treatment for patients with N0M0 disease and PSA level ≥98.0 ng/mL was significantly lower than for those with N1M0 disease (52.6% vs 60.4%; P<.001) or N0M0 disease and PSA level <98.0 ng/mL (52.6% vs 86.6%; P<.001). The 5-year OS rate was similar for patients with N1M0 disease and those with N0M0 disease and a very high PSA level (63.2% vs 59.1%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.91; P=.063). The survival benefit associated with locoregional treatment was higher among those with N0M0 disease and a very high PSA level than among those with N1M0 disease (aHR, 0.28 vs 0.44; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with clinical N0M0 disease and a very high PSA level (≥98.0 ng/mL) have outcomes similar to those with N1 disease but receive locoregional treatment at a lower rate. Future work is needed to investigate the utility of locoregional treatment in this population.

Minimum Data Elements for Radiation Oncology: An American Society for Radiation Oncology Consensus Paper.

PURPOSE: In recent years, the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) has received requests for a standard list of data elements from other societies, database architects, Electronic Health Record vendors and, most recently, the pharmaceutical industry. These requests point to a growing interest in capturing radiation oncology data within registries and for quality measurement, interoperability initiatives, and research. Identifying a short and consistent list will lead to improved care coordination, a reduction in data entry by practice staff, and a more complete view of the holistic approach required for cancer treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The task force formulated recommendations based on analysis from radiation specific data elements currently in use in registries, accreditation programs, incident learning systems, and electronic health records. The draft manuscript was peer reviewed by 8 reviewers and ASTRO legal counsel and was revised accordingly and posted on the ASTRO website for public comment in April 2019 for 2 weeks. The final document was approved by the ASTRO Board of Directors in June 2019.

Use and early mortality outcomes of active surveillance in patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Certain patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) may be appropriate candidates for active surveillance (AS). In the current study, the authors sought to characterize AS use and early mortality outcomes for patients with intermediate-risk PCa in the United States. METHODS: The novel Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Active Surveillance/Watchful Waiting database identified 52,940 men diagnosed with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate-risk PCa (cT2b-c, Gleason score of 7, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 10-20 ng/mL) and actively managed (AS, radiotherapy, or radical prostatectomy) from 2010 through 2015. The Cuzick test assessed AS time trends, and logistic multivariable regression characterized features associated with AS. Fine-Gray and Cox modeling determined PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) and overall survival, respectively. RESULTS: The rate of AS increased from 3.7% in 2010 to 7.3% in 2015, and from 7.2% to 11.7% among men aged ≥70 years. Among men with favorable and unfavorable intermediate-risk disease, the use of AS increased from 7.2% to 14.9% and from 2.2% to 3.8%, respectively (all P value for trend, <.001). The mean age of those patients managed with AS decreased from 69.9 years to 67.9 years (P = .0004). Factors found to be associated with AS included favorable risk disease; black race; higher socioeconomic status; older age; and diagnosis in the West, Northwest, or Midwest regions of the United States. The 5-year PCSM rate was comparable to AS versus treatment among patients with low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, but was worse with AS among those with unfavorable intermediate-risk disease (PCSM, 1.3% vs 0.5%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.48 [95% CI, 1.11-5.50; P = .026]) and intermediate-risk disease overall (PCSM, 1.1% vs 0.4%; adjusted hazard ratio, 2.34 [95% CI, 1.25-4.37; P = .008]). CONCLUSIONS: The use of AS for patients with intermediate-risk PCa is increasing across the United States, particularly for older men and those with favorable intermediate-risk disease. Early estimates of cancer-specific and overall mortality rates are low with AS, although significantly higher compared with treatment.

Androgen Deprivation Therapy and Overall Survival for Gleason 8 Versus Gleason 9-10 Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: While the addition of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) is known to improve overall survival (OS) in Gleason 8-10 (Grade Group 4-5) prostate cancer (PCa), it has been hypothesized that Gleason 9-10 disease, which is less differentiated than Gleason 8 disease, may be less sensitive to ADT. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between ADT and OS for Gleason 8 versus Gleason 9-10 PCa. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study of 20 139 men from the National Cancer Database with localized or locally advanced, Gleason 8-10 PCa who received EBRT. Data were collected from 2004 to 2012. INTERVENTION: ADT. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Cox proportional hazards regression was used to examine the association between ADT and OS. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 9509 (78%) of the 12 160 men with Gleason 8 disease and 6908 (87%) of the 7979 men with Gleason 9-10 disease received ADT. On multivariable analysis, ADT was associated with a significant improvement in OS for Gleason 8 patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.70-0.87, p<0.001) but not for Gleason 9-10 patients (adjusted hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.84-1.11, p=0.6), with a significant interaction (pinteraction=0.020). A higher Gleason score (8, 9, 10) correlated with an increased adjusted hazard ratio for the association between ADT and OS (pinteraction=0.042). Our study may be limited by the relatively short follow-up (median of 4.0 yr). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to the significant survival advantage of ADT for Gleason 8 disease, our results suggest that Gleason 9-10 disease derives less survival benefit from ADT and that a higher Gleason score predicts lesser benefit. Consideration should be given to treatment intensification for Gleason 9-10 patients through enrollment in clinical trials or potentially adding novel antiandrogens or docetaxel, which have shown efficacy in both castration-resistant and castration-sensitive settings. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this study, we examined the effect of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for Gleason 8 (Grade Group 4) versus Gleason 9-10 (Grade Group 5) prostate cancer. We found that Gleason 9-10 disease may derive a smaller survival benefit from ADT than Gleason 8 disease.